Legal & Tax Disclosure
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change. You should consult a qualified professional regarding your specific circumstances. |
Emily called, frantic. Her father had passed six months ago, and she’d just received a notice of default on the family cabin—a property inside her father’s living trust. Apparently, her father had taken out a second mortgage on the cabin years ago, and the lender was now pursuing foreclosure, despite the trust existing. “I thought the whole point of a trust was to avoid this!” she wailed. The heartbreaking truth? Her father hadn’t disclosed the loan when establishing the trust, and the lender wasn’t obligated to honor the trust’s existence against a prior, recorded lien. This situation, while extreme, highlights a critical—and often overlooked—issue: can you borrow against assets held in trust, and what are the potential consequences?
What Happens if a Trustee Needs Funds?

As trustee, you have a fiduciary duty to manage the trust assets responsibly. Sometimes, that means needing access to funds beyond the trust’s existing liquid assets. Perhaps an unexpected repair is needed on a trust-owned property, or an opportunity arises to make a beneficial investment. While ideally trusts are funded with enough liquid assets to cover foreseeable needs, life is rarely predictable. Direct borrowing against trust assets isn’t usually possible in the traditional sense; a trustee can’t simply take out a personal loan secured by the trust property. Instead, the trustee typically has two main options: a loan to the trust, or a line of credit secured by the trust assets.
Can a Trustee Take Out a Loan on Behalf of the Trust?
Yes, a trustee can take out a loan on behalf of the trust, but it’s considerably more complex than a personal loan. The trust itself becomes the borrower. This requires providing the lender with a copy of the trust document and demonstrating that the trustee has the authority to borrow on the trust’s behalf – usually outlined in the trust agreement. Lenders will scrutinize the trust agreement, the beneficiary designations, and the assets held within. They’ll also assess the trust’s ability to repay the loan based on the income-producing potential of the assets. If the trust owns real estate, this will likely involve a traditional mortgage application process, including appraisal and title insurance. It’s vital that the loan terms are clearly documented and approved by all beneficiaries, particularly if the loan significantly impacts the value of the trust estate.
What About Lines of Credit Secured by Trust Assets?
A line of credit offers more flexibility. A trustee can establish a line of credit secured by trust assets—typically real estate or marketable securities. This allows the trustee to draw funds as needed, up to a pre-approved limit, and pay interest only on the outstanding balance. While this avoids the cumbersome process of applying for a new loan each time funds are required, it carries similar scrutiny regarding the trust’s ability to repay. The lender will still require a thorough review of the trust documents and a valuation of the pledged assets. It’s crucial to remember that the line of credit is tied to the trust’s assets, not the trustee’s personal credit.
What are the Risks of Borrowing Against Trust Assets?
Borrowing against trust assets isn’t without risks. The most significant is the potential for foreclosure or liquidation if the trust defaults on the loan. This can severely diminish the assets available to beneficiaries and potentially lead to legal disputes. Another risk is the impact on the trust’s overall investment strategy. Taking on debt can limit the trustee’s ability to pursue other investment opportunities. Furthermore, borrowing can complicate the eventual distribution of assets to beneficiaries, as the loan must be repaid before they receive their inheritance.
How Does a CPA Help Navigate These Issues?
After 35+ years as both an Estate Planning Attorney and a CPA, I see a unique advantage in having both skillsets. While I can draft the trust document, the true complexity lies in the tax implications of borrowing. For instance, the interest paid on a loan secured by trust assets may be tax-deductible within the trust, but the rules are nuanced and depend on how the loan proceeds are used. More importantly, understanding the step-up in basis available under IRS rules is critical. If the trust acquires an asset and then borrows against it, the basis calculation upon distribution to beneficiaries can become complicated. A CPA can accurately track these calculations, minimizing capital gains taxes for your heirs. Moreover, accurate valuation of trust assets is essential for both securing the loan and complying with tax regulations.
What if Assets Were Missed When Funding the Trust?
It happens surprisingly often. Let’s say a primary residence, intended to be titled in the name of the trust, was accidentally overlooked. For deaths occurring on or after April 1, 2025, California’s AB 2016 (Probate Code § 13151) provides a streamlined process – a ‘Petition for Succession’ – for transferring that asset into the trust, bypassing traditional probate. Importantly, this is a Petition, requiring a court order, and is distinct from the Small Estate Affidavit, which has lower value limits. Assets valued up to $750,000 can qualify, providing a valuable safety net.
What About the Impact of Proposition 19?
It’s essential to consider Prop 19 when dealing with real estate held in trust. While transferring property into a revocable trust generally avoids reassessment, distributions to children will trigger a reassessment to current market value – unless the child uses the property as their primary residence within one year. This can create a significant tax burden and should be factored into your long-term estate planning strategy.
What’s the Future of Estate Tax Planning?
The OBBBA (One Big Beautiful Bill Act) permanently set the Federal Estate Tax Exemption to $15 million per person, effective January 1, 2026. This means that for most Californians, the primary goal of a living trust is now probate avoidance and privacy protection, rather than minimizing federal estate taxes. However, careful planning is still crucial to navigate the complexities of state estate taxes and ensure a smooth transfer of assets to your heirs.
What failures trigger court intervention and contests in California trust administration?
Success in trust administration depends on more than just the document; it requires active management of assets, precise accounting to beneficiaries, and careful navigation of tax rules. Whether dealing with a blended family or complex real estate, understanding the mechanics of trust law is the only way to ensure the grantor’s wishes survive scrutiny.
California trust planning is most effective when the structure is matched to the specific family goal and assets are fully funded into the trust name. When administration is handled with transparency and adherence to the Probate Code, the trust can fulfill its promise of privacy and efficiency.
Verified Authority on California Trust Law
-
Trust Validity (Probate Code § 15200): California Probate Code § 15200
The foundational statute confirming that a trust requires property to be valid. This is the legal basis for the “funding” requirement—without transferring assets (deeds, accounts) into the trust, the document is legally empty. -
Revocability Presumption (Probate Code § 15400): California Probate Code § 15400
Confirms that California trusts are presumed revocable unless stated otherwise. This grants the settlor the flexibility to change beneficiaries, trustees, or terms as life circumstances evolve. -
Primary Residence Succession (AB 2016): California Probate Code § 13151 (Petition for Succession)
Effective April 1, 2025, this statute acts as a backup for funding errors. If a primary residence (up to $750,000) is left out of the trust, this Petition to Determine Succession avoids a full probate administration. -
Property Tax Reassessment (Prop 19): California State Board of Equalization (Prop 19)
Essential for all trust creators. While the trust avoids probate, it does not automatically avoid property tax increases for heirs. Specific planning is required to navigate the “primary residence” requirement for children. -
Federal Estate Tax Exemption: IRS Estate Tax Guidelines
Reflects the permanent increase to a $15 million per person exemption (effective Jan 1, 2026). This shifts the planning focus for most Californians from tax avoidance to asset protection and probate avoidance. -
Digital Asset Access (RUFADAA): California Probate Code § 870 (RUFADAA)
Without this statutory authority included in your trust, your digital legacy (crypto, social media, cloud storage) may be permanently locked away from your family by service providers.
Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and State Bar advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship or any professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change, including recent 2026 developments under California’s AB 2016 and evolving federal estate and reporting requirements. You should consult a qualified attorney or advisor regarding your specific circumstances before taking action.
Responsible Attorney: Steven F. Bliss, California Attorney (Bar No. 147856).
Local Office:
The Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss Esq.43920 Margarita Rd Ste F Temecula, CA 92592 (951) 223-7000
The Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss Esq. is a practice location and trade name used by Steven F. Bliss, Esq., a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was researched and drafted by the Legal Editorial Team of the Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss, Esq., a collective of attorneys, legal writers, and paralegals dedicated to translating complex legal concepts into clear, accurate guidance.
Legal Review: This content was reviewed and approved by Steven F. Bliss, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 147856). Mr. Bliss concentrates his practice in estate planning and estate administration, advising clients on proactive planning strategies and representing fiduciaries in probate and trust administration proceedings when formal court involvement becomes necessary.
With more than 35 years of experience in California estate planning and estate administration, Mr. Bliss focuses on structuring enforceable estate plans, guiding fiduciaries through court-supervised proceedings, resolving creditor and notice issues, and coordinating asset management to support compliant, timely distributions and reduce fiduciary risk. |






