This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice.
Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or professional advisory relationship.
Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change. You should consult a qualified professional regarding your specific circumstances.
Emily just received a notice of hearing on her mother’s probate, and she’s panicking. She’s a busy executive who travels internationally, and the thought of flying back to California for a simple hearing feels incredibly disruptive – and expensive. She’s already lost sleep over the potential cost of missing work, plus the legal fees on top of it. She called, desperate to know if there’s any way to avoid being there in person.
Let’s address Emily’s concern, and yours, directly. While probate hearings used to require personal appearances, the rules have changed substantially, though navigating them requires precision. It’s not a simple “yes” or “no” answer. The current state of remote appearances, coupled with procedural pitfalls like uncleared Probate Notes and the need for a properly prepared Proposed Order, can quickly turn a seemingly straightforward process into a frustrating and costly ordeal.
First, the good news: California law now permanently allows for remote appearances in probate hearings, provided you give notice. Code of Civil Procedure § 367.75 specifically addresses this. The “emergency” rules implemented during the pandemic have been codified, offering a level of flexibility we didn’t have before. However, the judge retains discretion to require specific personal appearances for evidentiary hearings or trials. A quick, uncontested accounting might be perfectly suited for Zoom; a complex will contest involving multiple witnesses certainly will not. The key is proactive communication with the court and opposing counsel. Don’t assume remote appearance is permitted; confirm it with the court clerk.
But simply requesting a remote appearance isn’t enough. Many clients are surprised to learn that the hearing will be delayed, or even continued, if there are outstanding “Probate Notes” on the file. These notes are essentially questions or requests for clarification from the Probate Examiner – the court employee who reviews the petition before it reaches the judge. Most hearing delays are caused by uncleared Probate Notes. You cannot simply explain the issue to the judge in court; you MUST file a verified “Supplement to Petition” in writing at least 2-3 court days before the hearing to satisfy the Probate Examiner. Failing to do so is a common mistake that can add weeks to the process.
Further complicating matters is the issue of evidence. Probate Code § 1022 dictates how evidence is presented at a standard probate hearing. Generally, these are not “live witness” events. An affidavit or verified petition is received as evidence. If you intend to call witnesses to testify, the judge will likely continue the matter to a separate Evidentiary Hearing or trial date. Preparing for this requires advance notice and proper witness service.
And what happens if you disagree with something the opposing party is requesting? You don’t need a formal lawyer-written brief to object at the first hearing. You can appear and object orally. Probate Code § 1043 mandates that the court must then pause and give you a continuance (usually 30 days) to file your written objection. However, simply objecting doesn’t guarantee success. A well-reasoned, legally sound objection, supported by evidence, is essential.
Finally, don’t underestimate the importance of the Proposed Order. California Rule of Court 3.1312 outlines the requirements for court orders. The judge generally does not write the order for you. The prevailing party is responsible for preparing the “Proposed Order” and lodging it with the court before the hearing. If the judge grants your petition but there is no Order in the file to sign, you leave with nothing. It sounds ridiculous, but it happens far too often.
I’ve been practicing estate planning and probate law for over 35 years, and I’m also a Certified Public Accountant. That dual background gives me a unique perspective. As a CPA, I understand the critical importance of the “step-up in basis” for inherited assets, minimizing capital gains taxes, and accurately valuing estate property. Many attorneys overlook these tax implications, potentially costing clients significant money. My approach is always holistic – addressing both the legal and financial aspects of probate administration.
Ultimately, whether you must attend the hearing in person depends on the specifics of your case, the judge’s preferences, and your ability to proactively address potential procedural hurdles. Emily, and clients like her, need to understand the evolving rules, the importance of preparation, and the potential pitfalls of simply assuming everything will go smoothly. A little foresight and diligent work upfront can save a great deal of time, money, and stress in the long run.
What determines whether a California probate estate closes smoothly or turns into litigation?

California probate is designed to provide court-supervised transfer of property, yet cases often break down when authority is unclear, required steps are missed, or disputes arise over assets, notice, and fiduciary conduct. When the process is misunderstood, families can face avoidable delay, escalating conflict, and increased exposure to creditor issues, hearings, or litigation before the estate can close.
To close an estate cleanly, you must understand the requirements for how to close probate, prepare a detailed estate accounting requirements, and ensure the plan for final distribution is court-approved.
A stable probate administration outcome usually follows from clarity, consistency, and readiness for court review, especially when multiple stakeholders and competing interpretations are involved. When documentation supports enforcement and timelines are respected, families are less likely to face preventable escalation.
Verified Authority on California Probate Hearings
-
Oral Objections (The “Stop” Button): California Probate Code § 1043
This is the most important statute for beneficiaries. It grants an interested person the right to appear at the hearing and object orally to the petition. Once an oral objection is made, the court generally must continue the hearing to allow time for written objections to be filed. -
Remote Appearances (Zoom/CourtCall): California Code of Civil Procedure § 367.75
Modern probate hearings are often hybrid. This code section governs the right to appear remotely. While convenient, note that the court can typically require a physical appearance for “evidentiary” hearings where witness credibility is being judged. -
Affidavits as Evidence: California Probate Code § 1022
Unlike criminal court, probate hearings rely heavily on paper. A verified petition or an affidavit is admissible as evidence in an uncontested probate hearing. This is why “clearing your notes” in writing is more important than your oral argument. -
Notice of Hearing Requirements: California Probate Code § 1220
The court’s jurisdiction depends on this. The petitioner must mail notice of the hearing at least 15 days in advance to all interested parties. If the “Proof of Service” is not filed or is defective, the judge cannot legally hold the hearing. -
Lodging the Proposed Order: California Rules of Court 3.1312
A common rookie mistake is showing up without the paperwork. The “Proposed Order” (the document the judge signs) should generally be lodged with the court before the hearing. If the judge approves your petition but has nothing to sign, your Letters cannot be issued. -
Proving the Will (Witnesses): California Probate Code § 8220
If a Will is contested, or if it is not “self-proving” (lacking a proper attestation clause), the court may require the testimony of a subscribing witness at the hearing to prove the Will is authentic.
|
Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and State Bar advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship or any professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change, including recent 2026 developments under California’s AB 2016 and evolving federal estate and reporting requirements. You should consult a qualified attorney or advisor regarding your specific circumstances before taking action.
Responsible Attorney:
Steven F. Bliss, California Attorney (Bar No. 147856).
Local Office:
The Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss Esq.43920 Margarita Rd Ste F Temecula, CA 92592 (951) 223-7000
The Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss Esq. is a practice location and trade name used by Steven F. Bliss, Esq., a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was researched and drafted by the Legal Editorial Team of the Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss, Esq.,
a collective of attorneys, legal writers, and paralegals dedicated to translating complex legal concepts into clear, accurate guidance.
Legal Review:
This content was reviewed and approved by Steven F. Bliss, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 147856). Mr. Bliss concentrates his practice in estate planning and estate administration, advising clients on proactive planning strategies and representing fiduciaries in probate and trust administration proceedings when formal court involvement becomes necessary.
With more than 35 years of experience in California estate planning and estate administration,
Mr. Bliss focuses on structuring enforceable estate plans, guiding fiduciaries through court-supervised proceedings, resolving creditor and notice issues, and coordinating asset management to support compliant, timely distributions and reduce fiduciary risk. |