|
Legal & Tax Disclosure
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change. You should consult a qualified professional regarding your specific circumstances. |
Dax walked into my office last week, visibly distraught. He’d meticulously prepared for a probate hearing regarding his mother’s estate, had all his declarations ready, and even secured a key witness to confirm a specific family loan. Then he opened the mail – a notice rescheduling the hearing for a date after the witness left the country for a six-month assignment. He’d spent weeks preparing, incurring costs for expert reports and witness prep, and now faced the prospect of another delay, more expense, and the risk of losing crucial evidence. These situations are far more common than people realize, and understanding how to navigate a continuance request is paramount.
What are the Grounds for a Continuance?

A continuance isn’t granted simply because you want one. California Probate Code demands a showing of “good cause.” This typically means unforeseen circumstances that materially impact your ability to present your case effectively. Common grounds include witness unavailability (like Dax’s situation), illness, crucial evidence becoming unavailable, or a genuine need for more time to prepare. “Good cause” is subjective, and the judge has discretion, but a well-documented and compelling reason significantly increases your chances of success. A vague claim of “more time to prepare” rarely works; specificity is key. Showing you diligently attempted to obtain the witness’s testimony before their departure is a strong supporting argument.
How Do I Actually Request a Continuance?
The method for requesting a continuance depends on whether you’re already in court or haven’t yet appeared. If the hearing hasn’t started, the preferred method is to file a formal Motion to Continue Hearing (Form MC-020) before the scheduled date. This motion should clearly state the reason for the continuance, the length of delay requested, and a declaration outlining the supporting facts. Serve a copy on all interested parties. However, life doesn’t always allow for advance planning. If the crisis arises during the hearing itself, you can make an oral request to the judge. But be warned: Probate Code § 1043 allows you to make an oral request for continuance, but the court will immediately require you to file a written objection within 30 days if the continuance is granted.
What if the Other Party Opposes My Request?
Opposition is common, especially in contentious probate matters. The opposing party may file a written opposition to your Motion to Continue, outlining their reasons for objecting. The judge will then weigh both sides, considering the potential prejudice to both parties. If you anticipate opposition, it’s crucial to prepare a rebuttal, addressing their concerns and reinforcing your argument for good cause. This is where meticulous preparation and thorough documentation are invaluable. Sometimes, a simple phone call to opposing counsel to discuss the issue and reach a stipulation for a continuance can be the most efficient solution.
What About Ex Parte Continuances?
An ex parte continuance is requested without notice to the other party, usually in emergency situations. While possible, they are disfavored by the courts. You’ll need to demonstrate a truly urgent and unforeseen circumstance – for example, a sudden, incapacitating illness – and attempt to contact opposing counsel before making the request. Successfully obtaining an ex parte continuance is challenging, and you’ll likely need to follow up with a formal, noticed motion to ensure the continuance remains in effect.
What if I Simply Miss the Hearing?
Missing a hearing is a serious matter, and the consequences can be severe. Probate Code § 1220 dictates that if you weren’t properly notified, the order might be void. The petitioner has a strict duty to mail the Notice of Hearing (Form DE-120) to all interested persons at least 15 days prior, with a ‘Proof of Service’ filed with the court. However, even with proper notice, simply missing the hearing can lead to adverse rulings. You’ll need to file an immediate Motion to Set Aside Order and demonstrate excusable neglect. Don’t delay; the longer you wait, the harder it becomes to undo the consequences.
For over 35 years, I’ve practiced as both an Estate Planning Attorney and a Certified Public Accountant here in Temecula. This unique background gives me a distinct advantage when handling probate matters. As a CPA, I understand the crucial implications of step-up in basis, capital gains taxes, and asset valuation – issues often overlooked by attorneys without a financial background. Properly addressing these concerns can save your estate substantial sums in the long run.
What Happens at the Hearing If I Do Get a Continuance?
Even if the judge grants your continuance, don’t assume everything is settled. The judge will typically enter a minute order reflecting the new hearing date. However, to ensure clarity and avoid future disputes, it’s essential that the prevailing party – in this case, you – prepares a formal “Proposed Order” and lodges it with the court before the initial hearing date. California Rule of Court 3.1312 states the judge will generally sign your proposed order. If no order is lodged, you leave with nothing. Furthermore, ensure the court reporter notes the continuance for the record.
What About Testimony at the Hearing?
It’s important to remember that standard probate hearings aren’t designed for live witness testimony. Probate Code § 1022 states that an affidavit or verified petition is typically accepted as evidence. If you intend to call a witness to testify, the judge will likely continue the matter to a dedicated “Evidentiary Hearing” or trial date. Prepare your witness for direct and cross-examination.
What determines whether a California probate estate closes smoothly or turns into litigation?
California probate is designed to provide court-supervised transfer of property, yet cases often break down when authority is unclear, required steps are missed, or disputes arise over assets, notice, and fiduciary conduct. When the process is misunderstood, families can face avoidable delay, escalating conflict, and increased exposure to creditor issues, hearings, or litigation before the estate can close.
| Money Matter | Action |
|---|---|
| Bills | Manage creditor claims. |
| Challenges | Handle creditor claim disputes. |
| Overhead | Track probate costs. |
Ultimately, the difference between a routine distribution and a protracted legal battle often comes down to preparation. By anticipating the demands of the Probate Code and addressing potential friction points with beneficiaries and creditors upfront, fiduciaries can navigate the system with greater confidence and lower liability.
Verified Authority on California Probate Hearings
-
Oral Objections (The “Stop” Button): California Probate Code § 1043
This is the most important statute for beneficiaries. It grants an interested person the right to appear at the hearing and object orally to the petition. Once an oral objection is made, the court generally must continue the hearing to allow time for written objections to be filed. -
Remote Appearances (Zoom/CourtCall): California Code of Civil Procedure § 367.75
Modern probate hearings are often hybrid. This code section governs the right to appear remotely. While convenient, note that the court can typically require a physical appearance for “evidentiary” hearings where witness credibility is being judged. -
Affidavits as Evidence: California Probate Code § 1022
Unlike criminal court, probate hearings rely heavily on paper. A verified petition or an affidavit is admissible as evidence in an uncontested probate hearing. This is why “clearing your notes” in writing is more important than your oral argument. -
Notice of Hearing Requirements: California Probate Code § 1220
The court’s jurisdiction depends on this. The petitioner must mail notice of the hearing at least 15 days in advance to all interested parties. If the “Proof of Service” is not filed or is defective, the judge cannot legally hold the hearing. -
Lodging the Proposed Order: California Rules of Court 3.1312
A common rookie mistake is showing up without the paperwork. The “Proposed Order” (the document the judge signs) should generally be lodged with the court before the hearing. If the judge approves your petition but has nothing to sign, your Letters cannot be issued. -
Proving the Will (Witnesses): California Probate Code § 8220
If a Will is contested, or if it is not “self-proving” (lacking a proper attestation clause), the court may require the testimony of a subscribing witness at the hearing to prove the Will is authentic.
|
Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and State Bar advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship or any professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change, including recent 2026 developments under California’s AB 2016 and evolving federal estate and reporting requirements. You should consult a qualified attorney or advisor regarding your specific circumstances before taking action.
Responsible Attorney:
Steven F. Bliss, California Attorney (Bar No. 147856).
Local Office:
The Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss Esq.43920 Margarita Rd Ste F Temecula, CA 92592 (951) 223-7000
The Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss Esq. is a practice location and trade name used by Steven F. Bliss, Esq., a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was researched and drafted by the Legal Editorial Team of the Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss, Esq.,
a collective of attorneys, legal writers, and paralegals dedicated to translating complex legal concepts into clear, accurate guidance.
Legal Review:
This content was reviewed and approved by Steven F. Bliss, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 147856). Mr. Bliss concentrates his practice in estate planning and estate administration, advising clients on proactive planning strategies and representing fiduciaries in probate and trust administration proceedings when formal court involvement becomes necessary.
With more than 35 years of experience in California estate planning and estate administration,
Mr. Bliss focuses on structuring enforceable estate plans, guiding fiduciaries through court-supervised proceedings, resolving creditor and notice issues, and coordinating asset management to support compliant, timely distributions and reduce fiduciary risk. |